How come....
- digger
- Sys_op.
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: December 31st, 2009, 9:45 pm
- Location: Round the bend
- Contact:
Re: How come....
Just checking to see how observant you all were '
the first one was a test and it wasn't noticed at the time that the background wasn't opaque .
Now if something was to come along that was better then it just might change once more .
- Little John
- member
- Posts: 16399
- Joined: January 2nd, 2010, 1:46 pm
- Location: SE London
Re: How come....
One small observation/criticism.............it seems to me, that the top part of the "S" looks a bit too big. Its probably exactly the same size as the bottom bit but perspective/expectation makes it look out of proportion.
Yes this is the real "Little John" (or it could be "colin")
- digger
- Sys_op.
- Posts: 3393
- Joined: December 31st, 2009, 9:45 pm
- Location: Round the bend
- Contact:
Re: How come....
I'm pretty sure its the same top and bottom , so just another optical illusion .
I was playing about earlier with a entwined L with s but although it wasn't too bad and wasn't even similar to a dollar sign , it didn't come across well at favicon sizes.
Now I can't find it .
Everybodies welcome to have a go ... that's at the favicon not me
I was playing about earlier with a entwined L with s but although it wasn't too bad and wasn't even similar to a dollar sign , it didn't come across well at favicon sizes.
Now I can't find it .
Everybodies welcome to have a go ... that's at the favicon not me